<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rebuild and Focus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thephotographypages.co.uk/2008/02/rebuild-and-focus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thephotographypages.co.uk/2008/02/rebuild-and-focus/</link>
	<description>reviews, news, opinion, work in progress...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:21:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brendadada</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographypages.co.uk/2008/02/rebuild-and-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>brendadada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotohgraphypages.co.uk/2008/02/24/rebuild-and-focus/#comment-456</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;ve got the same, and it&#039;s waiting patiently until I&#039;ve got more time to generally faff around. SS Pro is so heavily customisable that I find it daunting, and always therefore tend to go back to the templates within LR itself.

I&#039;m not sure about the Upstart template. It&#039;s one of those things that might get better as it&#039;s used: lots of these templates really look so empty. It&#039;s too text-heavy though. I&#039;m definitely going to edit out some of the overblown meta-bleh from underneath the posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve got the same, and it&#8217;s waiting patiently until I&#8217;ve got more time to generally faff around. SS Pro is so heavily customisable that I find it daunting, and always therefore tend to go back to the templates within LR itself.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure about the Upstart template. It&#8217;s one of those things that might get better as it&#8217;s used: lots of these templates really look so empty. It&#8217;s too text-heavy though. I&#8217;m definitely going to edit out some of the overblown meta-bleh from underneath the posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Wild</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotographypages.co.uk/2008/02/rebuild-and-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Wild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotohgraphypages.co.uk/2008/02/24/rebuild-and-focus/#comment-455</guid>
		<description>That looks nice.

I really like the Lightroom flash galleries (and the rest of Lightroom for that matter). I&#039;ve got a licence for &lt;a href=&quot;http://slideshowpro.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SlideShow Pro for Lightroom&lt;/a&gt; and intend to use that at some point. At the end of the day it&#039;s just another slideshow option for Lightroom, but it looks really nice and tweakable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks nice.</p>
<p>I really like the Lightroom flash galleries (and the rest of Lightroom for that matter). I&#8217;ve got a licence for <a href="http://slideshowpro.net/">SlideShow Pro for Lightroom</a> and intend to use that at some point. At the end of the day it&#8217;s just another slideshow option for Lightroom, but it looks really nice and tweakable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

